If you have any doubts as to what you have read, let me refer you to FUNDAMENTALS OF LEGAL RESEARCH by Ervin H. Pollack Professor of Law and Librarian, Ohio State University. (copy attached). The United States Code is arranged in 50 Titles. Said Code is the current compilation of federal laws that is a combined editorial product of a Congressional Committee and the West Publishing Co., a corporation. It’s very upsetting to see people put in prison and have their property stolen from them based upon an editorial product of a committee and a corporation. This is the cold harsh reality of debt under Article IV Sec. 3. cl.2, but it is only prima facie19 evidence of the law rebuttable by the United States Statutes at Large and Statutes Annotated, or Revised Statutes. Take note that 48 Stat 113 (HJR 192) can only be prima facie evidence of law because there is no enacting clause as found in the National Coinage Act, therefore rebuttable by the National Coinage Act of April 2, 1792 at Statute I United States Statutes at Large Chap. XVI Section I that contains the words, “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress Assembled, and it is hereby enacted and declared, . . .”20 Now go back to p. 20 Vol. 53 Part I United States Statutes at Large, there is no enacting clause by the House and Senate of United States of America in Congress Assembled. Proof income taxes are 100% voluntary. Chap. 4 Gift taxes Sec. 1000 Imposition of Tax Sec. (b) reads in part: “but in the case of a non-resident not a citizen of the United States shall apply to a transfer only if the property is situated within the United States”, i.e., debt res or strawman. [underline emphasis added] See Title 26 USC Sec. 7203 of the code states “any person required to file or make a return.” It doesn’t say everybody is required. Title 26 USC Sec 2502(d) also states that when a gift is made (charitable subscription debt acknowledgement) the gift tax liability falls upon the donor. But then the IRS Code is only prima facie evidence of liability. If you have no public debt res as “other property” as the term is used in Art. IV Sec. 3. cl.2 in the United States, you are primarily a citizen of “the state” wherein you are domiciled. Secondarily you are a United States citizen. The term resident comes from the word res that pertain to insolvency or debt as stated on pp 16-17 supra. The facts and the law are very clear beyond any doubt that the taxing system is 100% voluntary. To pass a fair tax, flat tax, national sales tax or whatever you choose to call it, will be based upon repeal of the 16th amendment. The repeal will create a mandatory additional tax which there will be no escaping the liability for those who are not subject to Title 15 USC Chap. 41 Sec. 1602, (c), (d), (e) and Title 12 USC 95(a). This author has been asked many times, what is my opinion of the New World Order?
CORPORATIONS, QUASI CORPORATIONS, MARXISM, AND HEGELIAN DIALECTICS
The people are confronted with two very troubling issues that are fast coming to a head. No. 1. The mega national corporations are in the process of setting up a one world corporate monolith under corporate communism. Corporations enjoy two distinct privileges, limited liability for the privilege of discharging debt, i.e., corporations are not responsible for their debts should they fail, and perpetual succession, i.e., they live forever unless the government revokes their charter. Likewise, public policy of the unincorporated association has agreed not to demand payment as per HJR 192 and Title 15 USC Chap. 41 Sec. 1602 (c), (d), (e). In other words, the association enjoys limited liability for the discharge of debt and perpetual succession, i.e., will live forever unless the government revokes HJR 192. No. 2. Hegelian dialectics has turned into Marxist materialism. You cannot have a problem in reality then treat that problem with another problem that mirror images (in the spirit of) the real problem that is never solved and not expect a collision of the two sometime down the road. A perfect example is the mortgage collapse. Problem. Not everybody has a nice home. Solution. Not everybody is entitled to have a nice home. They simply do not have the skills to support the purchase of that home. That is the reality of life. But in the “spirit of” everybody having a nice home the banks, and lending institutions created another problem by financing homes that should not have been financed in the first place. Now the ripple comes into effect and starts to collapse the whole real estate base. But it does not stop there. The next shoe to drop will be those insane in the spirit of retirement plans that pays people the same amount or near same amount when retired as when they were working. This is particularly true of government employees, where 25% of the mandates are non-funded. In the world of reality those retirement plans do not exist. The real estate market was the pillars that upheld those retirement accounts along with pharmacy and oil investment accounts. Of course, the main ingredient to all this is GREED. As Alan Greenspan noted at a Congressional hearing: We should treat a fiat money system as though it was anchored in gold. The people and the government haven’t taken Greenspan’s advice, now we are going to suffer the consequences. There is no better example of greed than the article that appeared in the Saturday June 28, 2008 issue of the TIMES HERALD, PORT HURON, Michigan newspaper at page 6A, titled, “You May Be One of the Oil Speculators’” by Matthew Perrone of the Associated Press. The article goes on to say that large investors such as pension funds, investment bank, mutual funds and private hedge funds are using the commodity markets in oil to evade the failing value of the dollar. There has been $139 billion funneled into energy commodities by the end of March 2008. Rep.Bart Stupak D-Mich. Heads the Oversight and Investigations Committee of Energy and Commerce said: “Your pension fund manager may be using your retirement money to drive up the price of oil”. Sen. Joe Lieberman I- Conn. Proposed banning pension funds and other large investors from commodities altogether. He dropped the idea after vigorous opposition by the association of public and private pension funds. There you have it, another association raising havoc and mayhem all in the name of profit under limited liability. As noted above in this document, it is the absolute duty of Congress to protect and defend the Constitution to the United States of America and that includes Article I Section 10, Article IV section 3 cl.1; and the common law of “the states (s)” as evidenced by the gold in Fort Knox, Kentucky. Regarding the gold, as it stands today, the public could not return to our public National “Standard” lawful money because of many factors. One of the factors is the use of illegal drugs. It wouldn’t be long before our public gold and silver would end up in the hands of drug lords in the United States and foreign countries. Those drug lords would become even more powerful and destroy the economic base of United States, not to mention the grounded substance of the common law of “the states” that in reality are still there. Corporations are “persons” but not citizens with a charter from the secretary of state’s office, therefore have access to Article III courts. Whereas, the people of the unincorporated association are citizens and “persons” that have no charter and no legal identity,21 thus classified as “other property” or fictitious persons. Said “persons” only have access to legislative courts governed by a committee and a corporation of compelled performance to a culture of Marxist materialism. The Marxist government is designed to replace the male as head of the nuclear led family unit worshiping a God with its morality in body mind and soul; into a sectarian society of unidentifiable fatherhood worshiping the god of materialism produced by the corporations. Corporations do not live in a state of reality. You cannot see them, or touch them. All you see is a sign that has the name of the corporation on it, or see its property. It truly exists in the “spirit of” world of make believe. The masses of asses then divide into outspoken splinter groups that are not grounded in reality, but feminism with their insane and lunatic ideas that are composed of their illusions of the way they think things are, or the way they think things should be, guilt, prejudices, bias, and hate for the Constitution and how to control other people with their brand of lunacy and insanity. Their stupid identity is shown with the blame game accusing something or somebody for their own problems, then expects that something or somebody to solve those problems. There are those who build homes in flood plain areas, when they get flooded out, get the taxpayers to bail them out. Then add insult to injury by rebuilding on the same flood plane to be flooded out again at taxpayers’ expense. In the world of reality you don’t build in flood plain areas, and if you do, you’re on your own, that is reality; but in the spirit of the law that is ok because somebody else is responsible for those who got flooded out. That’s an example of the insanity and lunacy of public policy and limited liability for the discharge of debt that creates a quasi corporate privilege. People then complain of not getting the justice they think they deserve. Their better ideas are heavily steeped in what eventuality lead to pure corporate communism untouchable by any government. The fact that we are a nation of laws and not of men is damned. Their motto is “If it feels good, do it.” Even commit murder and take illegal drugs to escape what they think is reality when in fact, they are trying to escape public policies unincorporated association that is run by insane lunatics and fanatics. The rails are already greased in order to accomplish such lunacy and insanity by the creation of alphabet soup agencies, bureaucrats, and environmental extremists that draw up the association’s rules and regulations. Those rules and regulations are used to control the individual and the association to the exclusion of you,22 as a individual having access to Article III courts. As long as the individual remains a volunteer as a 14th amendment citizen “person” your only recourse to the federal court system is Congress’ legislative territorial courts under Article I. Said courts created under Article IV Section 3 cl.2 of the U.S. Constitution The more debt we create, the more watered down the Bill of Rights become, then eventually disappear completely. The recent 5 to 4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on the 2nd Amendment proved that four justices were willing, at the stroke of a pen, abolish the 2nd Amendment. What amendment is next? The first 10 Amendments were designed to protect the absolute property rights of the individual while engaged in Interstate Commerce from government intervention upon that individual protected by Swift v. Tysen 16 Peters 1 The problem is there is nothing to prevent a judge or judges from taking judicial notice of public policies bankruptcy and the individual as being a fictitious person. In other words, you do not exist in reality under the letter and strict meaning to the Constitution and Bill of Rights but; reside as a res-a-dent in the spirit and true meaning of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. In the real world of years past when somebody died, the term used was that he or she died, i.e., a physical death. Today in the world of make believe of privileges and immunities it is said we pass on, to where? the cemetery that has what? Perpetual care, i.e., in the spirit of, we never die. IT IS THE HEGELIAN/MARXIST DIALECTICS THAT IS THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE RETIREMENT PROGRAMS, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE THAT ARE HEAVILY STEEPED IN PHARMACEUTICAL AND OIL STOCKS. THIS IS WHY THE GOVERNMENT SUPPRESSES CHEAP ENERGY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE. DIALECTICS IS WHY MOST GOVERNMENT, AND A LOT OF PRIVATE PROGRAMS ARE A DISMAL FAILURE. THOSE PROGRAMS ARE DESIGNED TO TREAT SYMPTOMS AND NOT CAUSES WHICH KEEPS EXPANDING THE PUBLIC TRUST; OTHERWISE IT WILL COLLAPSE.
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contact of freedom … go home from us in peace We ask not your counsels of arms … crouch down and lick the hands that feed you … May your chains set lightly upon you … May posterity forget that ye are our countryman." - Samuel Adams, 1722-1803.
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." Somerset Maugham English Novelist and Playwright, 1874-1965.
From Dictionary of the History of Ideas Vol. I, 1973 on Democracy. Alex De Tocqueville a French Politician and Statesman, 5 Volumes 1805-1859
The tyranny of public opinion, Tocqueville argued, could prove more burdensome than the tyranny of any monarch. New values would predominate in a democratic society; the desire for riches would take the place of the desire for glory; there would be few totally uninstructed men but few learned ones. The prejudices, passions, and interests of the multitude would always have great weight, and this would generally militate against the type of political careers possible in more Aristocratic" societies. Government would not attract great talent, precisely because the interest in equality would make any kind of superiority irksome. Men of wealth would be preoccupied with their own affairs and not with those of the state. Democracy does not guarantee efficient government; it does provide freedom for the pursuit of one's own interest, subject always to the tyranny that comes from the majority insisting that its values and ideas should be safeguarded. Democratic societies have a taste for easy success and present enjoyment; this is their strength and their weakness. Equality, Tocqueville insisted, tends to isolate men to cause them to concentrate on themselves only; it gives them an inordinate desire for material goods and comfort. For him, the liberal French aristocrat, the important question for the future was how to avoid the new kind of despotism that might be based upon popular opinion, with the state's power being “absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild." Tocqueville saw the new state power as rather like that of the parent, except that the parent prepared the child for manhood; the democratic state was interested in perpetuating childhood in man. It would provide for his necessities, facilitate his pleasures, and direct his industry. What remains, Tocqueville asked, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?”
1. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. 2. You cannot help small men by tearing down big men. 3. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. 4. You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. 5. You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich. 6. You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income. 7. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by exciting class hatred. 8. You cannot establish security on borrowed money. 9. You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence. 10. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves. First printed in 1916 by Reverend William John Henry Boetcker from Erie Pa. Born 1873.
PLATOISM. The philosophical position which says that universal truths existed as ideal substances before creation, exterior to creation, and that there is nothing of these truths in nature except as they reflect the universal, Hellenic proto-Lockeism, maintaining that humans are of no value except as blank tablets to be writ upon by others, and so echoed in Marxian dialectic and the theory of compulsory consumption of the wares promoted by an elite. Environmentalism. Pygmalionsim, Socialism. Aristotelanism. Fundamentally, the philosophical doctrine that knowledge of universals (such as ‘good’, ‘man’, ‘truth’) and of all reality arises and is discovered out of individuals. The opposite of Platonism. Postulates personal appreciation. Please do not make a religious argument of the above. I’m trying to give you the correct perspective based upon facts surrounding the law. It has been my belief for years that the Bible is a history book of the law but could not come to that conclusion until I discovered what our Constitution is all about. The choice of law is up to you. If you find the above disturbing, trash it.
ONE THING IS FOR CERTAIN IN THIS WORLD, YOU ARE GOING TO GET WITH WHAT YOU ARE WILLING TO PUT UP WITH.
I do not want people to make a religious argument out of the above. I am merely trying to show that the Bible is what I believe, based upon facts presented, to be a history book of the law. Religion is a personal issue within oneself and has no place in the letter of the law. Today’s public policy is an unincorporated association that is not considered a legal entity under the common law. If public policy was grounded in the letter of the law, we would not have every bodies religion mixed in today’s public policy with its spirit of the law. I have folks studying my materials who are very religious people and they have told me that my materials make their religious beliefs even stronger in that they look within themselves instead of looking outward to something or somebody. Remember, we are a nation of laws, not of men. We must keep it that way.
Lee Brobst eagleeye@pennswoods.net This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
19 At first glance, rebuttable by other evidence. Black’s Law Dict. 5th ed.
20 The Pa Judicial Code is only prima facie evidence of the law if there is no enacting clause. The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania enables the General Assembly to enact only certain public statutes and specifies how these statutes are to come about: Pennsylvania is enforcing federalism through the bankruptcy subject to the following and for the more perfect satisfaction of the public, the reasons and motives for making such laws shall be fully and clearly expressed in the preambles. (Section the Fifteenth.) : The stile of laws of this commonwealth shall be, “Be it enacted, and it is hereby enacted by the representatives of the freemen of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania in general assembly met, and by the authority of the same." How many laws conform to the above mandates? How can Pennsylvania circumvent the above and the National Coinage Act of April 2, 1792 at Statute I United States Statutes at Large Chap. XVI Section I. “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress Assembled, and it is hereby enacted and declared, . . .” See also Sec. 14 and 16 of said Act. [Italics in original] and, Article I Section 10 in order to implement federalism. But then it is easier to complain than do something about it. 21 An unincorporated society; a body of persons united and acting together without a charter, but upon the methods and forms used by incorporated bodies for the prosecution of some common enterprise. Clark v. Grand Lodge of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 328 Mo. 1084, 43 S.W.2d 404, 408. It is not a legal entity separate from the persons who compose it. See also Affiliation.
22 Please take note that the book titled THE LAW by Bastist pertains to Article IV Sec. 3 cl.1 to the Constitution of United States. Bastist’s book does not deal with an unincorporated society with special privileges and immunities such as limited liability and perpetual succession as does Article IV Sec. 3 cl.2 of the U.S. Constitution